爱达荷州立大学中国学生学者联谊会

Chinese Association of Idaho State University (CAISU)



Fury Movie Download Hd ->>->>->> DOWNLOAD


Original Title: Fury

Genge: Action,Drama,War

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April, 1945. As the Allies make their final push in the European Theatre, a battle-hardened Army sergeant named Wardaddy commands a Sherman tank and his five-man crew on a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Outnumbered, out-gunned, and with a rookie soldier thrust into their platoon, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds in their heroic attempts to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
A grizzled tank commander makes tough decisions as he and his crew fight their way across Germany in April, 1945.
I only watched this film due to believing it addressed, at least to some degree, one of the worst failings in the U.S. war machine during WW2, the Sherman tank and our other armor. Starting the show with a reference to this issue, I expected something of substance to follow, but that was totally incorrect. Since I'm not a fan of Hollywood garbage, I had to look up this director and his other "work," and I immediately saw the problem. Ayer is a little boy who seems to think he can run roughshod over history, and the people whose sacrifices made possible his arrogant and foolish productions. Being criticized by the British Prime Minister for re-writing the the past, specifically the code breaker's war in the European theater, with his shlock "U-571", didn't teach him a thing, though he espoused his shame and guilt at the time. Why there's not a veteran's lobby to shut down quacks like him is a real tragedy, just like the soldier's helplessness over useless commanders. Comic books like this film belong in the kiddy aisle in life, not the history section.

The reviews I've read are spot on, covering in detail the execrable ending as well as other nonsense scenes, so I'll give the reader a little background on why our soldiers were stuck in the "Death Traps" that usually just carried them to their doom. I don't know all the details, meaning how much pressure or resistance was placed on the U.S. Army by Detroit, the manufacturers of the tanks, or the financiers. But the General in charge was named Lesley McNair, and he was incompetent on several levels, not just armor. Despite all evidence to the contrary, he insisted our tanks could stand up to German high velocity anti-tank weapons and heavy tanks, such as the Tiger I in this film and the Panther, not shown. He held up the development of a heavy tank, the Pershing M-26, which could do battle with them, until General Devers, who was actually leading troops in combat, went over his head to George Marshall. There's much more to the story, and the director has claimed to have studied Belton Cooper's work explicating the horrors and shortcomings of the Sherman, but only the opposite of that, his adolescent mockery of the tactics of our tankers, is in evidence here. It is sufficient to say that absolutely no one approached either the German tanks or their anti-tank weapons head on at this stage of the war, not voluntarily; all those types were sent to the bone yard back in France if not before. But that doesn't get other ignorant boys, as I used to be, into the theater, and doesn't give them an unrealistic view of combat making them amenable to recruitment.

The good news for future armored units after WW2 is that McNair was killed by friendly fire in Normandy, when a heavy bomber actually dropped one right in his foxhole. Now THAT'S what I call precision bombing! It's a shame this phlegm maker is turning people's suffering into more padding for his bank account, without any leader in the U.S. stepping up as did Tony Blair previously.

But that's Hollywoodtown Jake. It don't mean a thing. I took a couple of days to think over the movie, and I think that changed my opinion quite a bit. Let me start off by saying that most movies start at the beginning of a story, but Fury is a war film that chooses to kick off at the tail-end of one, when the stakes are high and the soldiers are broken. Proceedings commence in early 1945, with the conclusion of WWII fast approaching. But the American tank units on the ground don't know that, having suffered staggering losses to the superiority of German armor and fire-power. This movie had a strong start, it really showed how depressing and horrible the sight of War is. There were definitely cons throughout the movie, for example, what really was a waste of time and what seemed to be a 30 minute long scene, was during the middle of the movie, when Brad and Logan enter the soon to be collapsing building, they begin with hostile intentions, but soon settle down with the 2 woman in the room. It was WAY over-timed. It felt like the director couldn't think of any ideas to continue the scene, so he just decided to make it last a long time. The movie started to make you hate all the characters but Logan, which partially ruined it for me. Aside from that, the movie was great and enjoyable, it kept you on the edge of your seat. Effects were very well done, except the fact that the bullet rays were Green and Red. (Star Wars Much).. The ending was very depressing, but thats what made it that much better. I didn't expect all but one soldier to die in that Tank. :( The casting was spot on! I couldn't think of any other actors to take the rolls of these characters. Overall, I think this movie is definitely worth a watch, I would go view it a second time if I got the chance!

-Deeba Any Hollywood gloss has been scoured away: the plot is raw, episodic and wholly unsentimental; a gruelling onward rumble from one brush with death to the next.
His tank was the first one destroyed in the battle with the Tiger tank. These are not laser beams, they are "tracer rounds". They are typically loaded in machine guns and tank shells as a way to determine where the rounds are actually firing. Should they miss, you can adjust your aim accordingly by watching the direction the round is firing. The average lifespan can't really be confirmed. But it is a generalization that Allied tank crews suffered heavy losses at the hands of the superior German armour, which is true. The Sherman tank was used by the Allies in every theatre of World War 2 and was famed for its speed, maneuverability, reliability, ease of mass production and ease of repair/maintenance. However, its' initial 75mm, and later on 76mm gun, was generally incapable of penetrating the main armour of its' German counterparts, the Panther, Tiger 1E, and later King Tiger. The Panther's high-velocity 75mm gun, and the Tiger and King Tiger's 88mm gun (initially designed for anti-aircraft roles) could easily defeat the Sherman's armoured protection, as could German infantry anti-tank weapons. The Sherman's high profile also made it comparatively easy to spot, and its' use of a petrol (gasoline) engine gave it an unfortunate propensity to burst into flames when hit. British and Canadian troops nicknamed them 'Ronsons' due to this fact in reference to a brand of cigarette lighters that are guaranteed to 'Light every time'. The Germans rather more bluntly referred to them as 'Tommy cookers'. The German tanks also used petrol engines, but one model of the Sherman, the M4A2, did use a diesel engine, but most of its production went to the US Marines in the Pacific, and the Russians.

You can find the armor stats for almost any armored fighting vehicle in history online. Look up the Tiger I, King Tiger, and the Panther; both later models had sloped armor which greatly added to deflecting armor piercing rounds, compared that with the Sherman. It was simply pitiful for the General in charge of Ground Forces, Lesley McNair, to be allowed to send so many soldiers into battle in such an inferior weapon, that was practically obsolescent after the introduction of the Tiger. But the Sherman was designed as an infantry support tank, not a tank-vs-tank unit, like its German opponents (and most modern-day 'main battle' tanks).

Generally, German tanks were technically superior to Allied tanks. The problem the Germans had was that with a war on two fronts, and heavy Allied bombing, they simply couldn't produce the tanks quick enough. Their tanks were also over-engineered, and units produced towards the end of the war tended to break down too easily. Additionally, on the last year, they also ran out of manpower to crew the tanks. The Tiger tank was a heavy tank at 54 tonnes, versus the Sherman at 30-33.5 tonnes but (as shown by the film) it could only be knocked out by the Sherman's cannon at close quarters, from the side or behind where the armor was thinner. The Sherman could also do it with the specialized 76mm High-Velocity Armor-Piercing ammunition (type M93 HVAP) but this was in very limited supply, and priority went to the M36 'Jackson' and other tank destroyers. Battlefield comments from Normandy onwards showed that on average it took the loss of 7 Shermans to knock out one Tiger tank. The US did, however, have a lot more tanks than the Germans. The German antitank weapon called the Panzerfaust (seen in the film, being pulled from its packing crates in the darkness) was also greatly feared by Allied tank crews. The one-shot LAW-type device had a hollow charge and could knock out any Allied tank at close range (the Panzerschreck was a heavier reloadable bazooka-like weapon). During the last months of the war in Europe, the Allies also had greatly superior air power as well and this helped to negate the tank advantage on the ground that the Germans had. The film showcases the Sherman's main strengths in combat - bristling with machine guns (including the powerful .50 M2HB, nicknamed the 'Fifty' or 'Ma Deuce') and its maneuverability, which made it an excellent infantry support weapon.

Its interesting to note that the tanks shown in the movie were a mixed bag: 'Fury' was an M4A2E8 (76)W HVSS Sherman tank, and 'Lucy Sue' an M4A2 Sherman, but as you don't see the engine decks, so for sake of the story, they could be mistaken for petrol-fueled units (the A2's carried a diesel powerplant. 'Matador' is an M4E8 (76)W HVSS Sherman, 'Murder, Inc.' an M4A4 Sherman, and 'Old Phyllis' an M4A1 (76)W Sherman. All but Lucy Sue were later 'W' or wet-stowage ammunition types, and only Matador and Fury had the main gun capable of doing serious damage to the Tiger, and the later HVSS wide suspension track system. They carefully did not use the up-gunned British Shermans, which got a powerful 17-pounder QF gun of equivalent calibre to the 76mm, but with considerably more penetration - this Sherman was called the Firefly.



https://worlslopeanad.gq/rls/Watch-hollywood-movies-720p-online-Epi...
https://sturoxisrie.ml/uro/Movieweb-Faust---Vom-Himmel-durch-die-We...
https://susguiwiesa.ml/sgu/Movie-downloads-to-psp-Opening-of-the-Y-...
https://worksneakconre.tk/rks/Movie-downloads-sites-A-Robust-Romeo-...
https://dirtspitafgi.ml/rts/400mb-movies-direct-download-Ya-ego-nev...
http://haconrossnar.ddns.net/p4210.html

ee03413ba2

Betrothed full movie in italian 720p
Mountain Man download di film interi in hd
download Anger Management
Octo-Puzzle One Suitcase Is Now Enough song free download

查看次数: 2

评论

您必须是爱达荷州立大学中国学生学者联谊会 的成员才能加评论!

加入 爱达荷州立大学中国学生学者联谊会

Local News

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   提供支持

报告问题  |  用户协议